Another way to pose the question: A popular undergrad Psychology textbook defines these terms as follows, but not everyone agrees. What's wrong or missing from these definitions (that I haven't captured above)?
This is so interesting to me bc to me, the "feeling" is the physiological sensation and the "emotion" is the cognitive appraisal of that feeling in your subjectivity.
Relationship to memory not stated explicitly. Beyond immediate state of organism (mood, context), which emotion a given stimulus evokes will depend on prior experience of the same stimulus or similar stimuli (arguably implied in term "cognitive appraisal",but does it capture, say, stimulus fatigue?)
I’m a fan of Damasio. Keeps it simple: emotions are just the brain contextualizing thing that the body already feels. I know there’s a causality isse with emotions clearly caused by conscious processing…or is there? Anyway don’t know if he’s still relevant, it’s been a while.
I think these are mostly ok but 1. Emotion definition implies tighter correlation between physiological and subjective responses than seen in human research 2. At least as used in clinical, “mood” doesn’t imply not knowing cause or only “vague awareness “ only longer duration